Abstract In the 1920s and 1930s of the 20th century, from 1927 to 1936, the decade of the left-wing began with the debate on "revolutionary literature" and ended with the debate on "two slogans". The left-wing literary movement is changing, complex and even full of contradictions. We can't talk about left-wing literature without talking about LuXun. Left-wing literature and LuXun are closely linked and cannot be separated. They not only have great significance in the history of modern Chinese literature, but also have a profound influence on the political movements in yan 'an period and even after the founding of the People's Republic of China. Although in LuXun's thought research, turning left has been a conclusion. But in the framework of value judgment first, how does Lu Xun's thought turn to the left in several literary debates will be ignored. Therefore, it is more difficult to restore the real LuXun. The focus of the paper is as follows. After three debates on left-wing literature, including the debate on "revolutionary literature", the debate on freedom of literature and art and the debate on "two slogans", what kind of historical environment did LuXun move towards the left-wing camp step by step and realized the left transformation of his thoughts. At the same time, LuXun was also special. Even after joining the left-wing camp, LuXun still retained strong personal will and was not completely attached to political parties and organizations. He maintained an integrated and alienated relationship with the whole left camp. By comparing the viewpoints of LuXun and others in the three literary debates, this paper analyzes and sums up the differences between the two sides and discusses LuXun's thinking and insistence. The thesis is divided into four chapters. The first three chapters examine the differences between LuXun and others in the three literary debates. By restoring the historical and political context and combining the realistic environment at that time, we can deeply interpret the differences between the two sides. Starting from his own experience, LuXun can often penetrate the surface discourse and keenly see the problems in the left camp. He never stopped thinking about the true spirit of the left. Till the end, LuXun was still worried about the Chinese literary world. Chapter four summarizes the transformation of LuXun's thought. LuXun 's turning left is reflected not only in his thoughts from enlightenment to revolution, but also in his more essays. The transformation of LuXun's thought has certain inevitability. in the dark and cruel environment, facing the oppression of the rulers and the resistance of the left wing, he upheld the conscience and responsibility of intellectuals. He chose to move to the left and speak for the oppressed people. Starting from the literary debate, we can dearly sort out the vein of LuXun's thought turning to the left LuXun's turning left is not a simple change of faith, nor a change of personal position, nor a complete commitment to a certain camp. In this process, he has his own consistent stick. Key words: Left wing, LuXun , Literature debate, Turning left

二十世紀的二三十年代, 從1927年到1936年, 左翼十年發端于“革命文學論爭,止於“兩個口號”論爭,左翼文學運動是變化的、複雜的甚至充滿矛盾的。論及左翼文學，就不能不談到魯迅。左翼文學與魯迅之間聯紧緊密，無法割裂二者不僅在中國現代文學史中有重要意義,更深刻影響了延安時期乃至建國後的幾次政治運動。 雖然在魯迅的思想研究中，“向左轉”已經是個定論，但在價值判斷先行的框架下，幾次文學論爭中魯迅思想是如何向左轉變的過程就會被忽視，因此更難於還原真實的魯迅。論文的關注重點在於，歷經了包括“革命文學”論爭、文藝自由論辯和“兩個口號”論爭在内的三次左翼文學論爭,魯迅是在怎樣的歷史環境中一步步走向左翼陣營，實現了思想的向左轉。同時，魯迅也是特殊的，即使是在加人左翼陣營之後，魯迅仍然保有強烈的個人意志，並未完全依附於政黨和組織，與左翼整體保持一種既融合又疏離的關係，通過對比三次文學論爭中魯迅與其他人的觀點，分析歸納雙方的分歧，探討魯迅的思考與堅持。 論文整體分為四章。前三章分別考察了三次文學論爭中魯迅與其他人觀點的不同，還原歷史政治語境，結合當時的現實環境，深入解讀雙方的分歧，魯迅從自身經驗出發，往往能穿透表層的話語，敏銳的看到左翼陣營中存在的問题，他從未停止對真正的左翼精神的思考，直至最後，魯迅仍然在為中國文壇而擔憂。第四章總結了魯迅思想的轉變,魯迅的向左轉，既體現在他的思想中心由啟蒙轉移到革命，又體現在他更多進行雜文創作。魯迅思想的轉變有一定必然性，在黑暗殘酷的現實環境中，面對统治者的迫和左翼的抗爭，他秉持著知識份子的良心與责任，選擇向左翼靠攏，為飽受壓迫的大眾發聲。從文學論爭出發，可以清晰的梳理出魯迅思想向左轉變的脈絡，魯迅的“向左轉”並不是簡單的改換信仰，也不是個人立場的變化，更不是完全投身於某一個陣營，在這個過程中，魯迅有自己一以貫之的堅守。 關鍵詞∶左翼 魯迅 文學論爭 向左轉