A Study on the Procedure of Environmental Administrative Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice in China Xie Yuan Jun(Chinese Language-Environmental and Nature Resources Law) Directed by Prof. Li Zhe Abstract: In the “two-law converge” in the field of environment protection, procedural rules are avoided selectively because of cost; environmental protection agencies follow paradox that convergence program expands the liability risk; executive power and judicial power in the presence of environmental justice exist ablation and transgression; convergence program has weak incentives and constraints; and so on, which cause structural imbalance of “two-law converge”. Standardize the transfer program of environmental crimes from the aspect of clearing transfer standards, the transfer deadline and early intervention program; take different standardize the collection and transformation, re-collect the conversion, and attorney transformation to standardize the collection and transformation program between administrative evidence and criminal evidence; sound protection mechanism of “two-law converge” in the field of environmental protection from accelerating the construction of case information sharing platform, improving the incentive mechanism of “two-law converge”, playing administrative supervision and prosecutor supervision, in order to promote the development of environmental justice healthy and orderly. Key words: environmental administrative enforcement; environmental criminal justice; convergence program; “two-law converge”

我国环境行政执法与刑事司法衔接机制的程序研究 摘 要 行政违法与刑事犯罪的“双轨制”，决定了环境行政执法与刑事司法机制的关键。在环境保护领域“两法衔接”机制中，程序性规则因成本问题别选择性规避；环保机构遵循衔接程序存在扩大责任风险的悖论；行政权与司法权在环境司法中存在的消融与僭越；“衔接程序”遭遇无力的激励与约束等因素，造成环境保护领域“两法衔接”的结构性失衡。应从明确移送职责、移送标准、移送期限、提前介入程序等方面规范涉嫌环境犯罪案件的移送程序；采取直接调取转化、重新收集转化、授权委托转化等不同标准规范行政证据与刑事证据的收集与转化程序；从加快案件信息共享平台建设、完善“两法衔接”机制的激励机制、发挥行政监察与检察监督等健全环境保护领域“两法衔接”机制的保障机制。从而促进环境司法的健康有序发展。 关键词：环境行政执法，环境刑事司法，衔接程序，“两法衔接”