The official national standard spoken language of China is Mandarin, which is based on the principal dialect spoken in and around Beijing. Cantonese and Chiuchow are the Chinese dialects. Beijing language is the northern dialect when Cantonese and Chiuchow are the southern dialects, which are the two of the seven major dialects in China. There are big differences of the interrogative sentences amonge these three languages. This article will analyze the differences and find out the discipline. This paper includes the following six parts: Part I is introduction, including four sections: The fist section introduces the concept of Beijing language, Cantonese and Chiuchow. The second section introduces the nature and the classification of the interrogative sentence. The third section commentates and borrows ideas from the two papers about the interrogative sentence. The fourth section is about the purpose and the method of the research. Part II is about the differences and similarities in the specific interrogation, including three sections: The first section is about the interrogative pronoun. The second section compares the basic sentence pattern of the specific interrogation among the three languages. The third section compares the specific interrogation which has no interrogative pronoun. Part III is about the differences and similarities in the yes-no question interrogation, including three sections: The first section is the differences and similarities in the sentence pattern “S+An interrogative particle”. The second section is the differences and similarities in the sentence pattern “S+An questioning intonation”. The third section introduces the grammatical means "accession" of the Chiuchow yes-no question interrogation. Part IV is about the differences and similarities in the alternative interrogation, including two sections: The first section compares the juxtaposition alternative interrogation and found out that they are the same in this sentence pattern. The second section compares the modes which make up of the alternative interrogation of Beijing language, Cantonese and Chiuchow. Part V is about the differences and similarities in the positive and negative interrogation, including five sections: The first section is about the positive and negative interrogation pattern “PI” of Chiuchow. The second section is about the positive and negative interrogation pattern “WEI” of Chiuchow. The third section is about the positive and negative interrogation pattern “YOU......WU" of Chiuchow. The fourth section is about the differences and similarities in the odditional sentence pattern of the positive and negative interrogation among Beijing language, Cantonese and Chiuchow. The fifth section is about the positive and negative interrogation pattern “HUI......WUHUI” of Chiuchow. Part VI is conclusion: The alternative interrogations of Beijing language, Cantonese and Chiuchow are the same when there are lots of differences in the specific interrogation, the yes-no question interrogation and the positive and negative interrogation. Keywords: Beijing Language, Cantonese, Chiuchow, Interrogative sentences, Differences

北京話是中國官話，是普通話，而廣州話、潮汕話都是中國的方言。北京話屬於北方話，廣州話屬於南方粤方言，潮汕話於南方方言，它們是中國七大方言中的兩種。這三种語言中的疑問句存在著较大差異。本文擬由疑問句的一些基本問题出發，特指問句、是非問句、擇問句、正反問句四種疑問句型來分析三者的具體差異，進而找出相规律，為方言學習愛好者提供一定的参考。 本論文主要包括以下六個部份:第一部份緒論，包括四個小節:第一介绍北京話、廣州話、潮汕話的概念;第二節介绍漢語疑問句的性質與分類;第三對兩篇疑問句對比文章的簡短述評及借鑑;第四節介紹本文的研究目的、意義及研究方法。第二部份北京話、廣州話、潮汕話的特指問句對比研究，包括三個小節:第一節主要比較三种語言的特指問句的疑問代詞;第二系统比较三種語言特指問句的基本句式;第三節比较三种語言不含疑問代詞的特指問句。 第三部份北京話、廣州話、潮汕話的是非問句對比研究，包括三個小節:第一節比較三种語言的“S+疑問語氣助詞”式是非問句;第二比較三種語言的“S+疑問語調”式是非問句;第三節主要介紹潮汕話是非問句的“添加”語法手段。 第四部份北京話、廣州話、潮汕話的選擇問句對比研究，包括兩個小節:第一節比較三種語言的並列選擇問句;第二節比較三种語言組成選擇問句的方式，即語音手段和語法手段。 第五部份北京話、廣州話、潮汕話的正反問句對比研究，包括五個小節:第一節介紹潮汕話正反問句的否定詞“伓”式;第二介紹潮汕話正反問句的否定詞“未”式;第三節介紹潮汕話正反問句的“有……無”式;第四節比較三種語言的附加式正反問句:第五介绍潮汕話“会……勿會(賣)”式正反問句。第六部份結論:在北京話、廣州話、潮汕話的選擇問句中，無論是並列選擇問句還是組成選擇問句的方式，都是相同的。而它們的特指問句、是非問句、正反問句都差異甚大。 關鍵詞:北京話，廣州話，潮汕話，疑問句，異同