With the tendency of globalization in the economic field, the connections among the enterprises are closer, a growing number of them are willing to chose the mode of Joint Venture in their investment and operating to pool their resources and risks so that to promote the efficiency and competitive strength. As a special kind of organization between cartel and amalgamation, joint venture may cause concentration of market power and barriers in the market access, however, it may also coordinate the competitive relations between the parties participating in the joint venture. so that could work as a restrictive practice. The ambiguity of the nature of joint venture leads to the uncertainty when it comes to the applicable law, and thus makes itself a tricky issue in the field of antimonopoly law worldwide. In china, there is no specific definition to joint venture, besides, the legal research on anti-monopoly regulation is relatively scarce and superficial. On the contrary, European Union has already built a completed and successful system in the regulation of joint venture, its standard on the division and implementation of joint venture, its abundant practice experiences and academic resource have all reached a high level. As the Chinese antimonopoly law mainly originally sprang from the EU antimonopoly law, the experience of EU is worthy of understanding and using for reference to us. My thesis will start with the history, focal point and reasons to modification of EU Joint Venture Regulation, and analyze the effect of government policy and jurisprudence behind them, I will also analyze the core content of the current EU Joint Venture Regulation and several classic cases in this realm, and discuss the problems it may give rise. On that basis, I will extract and centralize the experience of the EU and try to find a solution to China when the relevant law is lacking, I will also attempt to construct a Chinese joint venture regulation system for the reference of the legislature and practice institution of the country. Key words: Joint Venture, European Union, Anti-Monopoly Law, Regulation of Law.

随著經濟的全球化發展，企業之問的聯繁更加緊密，越來越多的企業樂於選擇合資的投資經營模式進行經濟活動以此來集中資源、分擔風險，提升效率，增強自身的競争力。但合資作爲界於合併與卡特爾間的一種組，其既有可能造成市場力量的集中和進入市場的障礙，也有可能協調參加合資的各方之間的競争關係，產生限制競争協議的效果。合资性質上的模糊性造成了其法律適用的不確定性，也因此成爲各國反壟斷法中十分棘手的問题。 我國反壟斷法缺乏對合資的專門界定，學術界對合資的反斷規制的研究也是只鳞片甲，不夠深入。然而歐盟反壟斷法對合資的規範已建立起一套完整而且成熟的體系，對合資的區分規制方式和詳盡的實施規範以及在實踐中積累的大量經驗和理論研究的資源都處在較高的水準。又加之我國反壟斷法的制定大體以歐盟反壟斷法爲藍本，所以歐盟反壟斷法對合資的規制經驗十分值得我借鑒。 本文試從歐盟合資規範的歷史演變、規範重點以及修正理由入手，探討歐盟合資規範演變背後的政策和法理考量，並對於現行歐盟合資規範的核心内容加以詳細分析，結合歐共體處理合資行爲的典型判例的分析，對合資所涉及的規範及其可能產生的法律問题加以探討。在此基礎上，提煉出歐盟關於合資規範驗對於我國合資規制的啓示。然後根據我國反壟斷法的現状，探討我國如何在既有的法律框架内規範合資行爲，提出我國合資反壟斷法規制體系建的思路，以供我國競爭主管機關制定合資相關的處理規則及審查合資案件時參考。 關鍵字：合資 反壟斷法 歐盟 法律規制